| 1. | 11/14/2007 1:41:00 PM | our health system has it own database |
| 2. | 11/14/2007 5:30:00 PM | Fiancial and work-flow issues |
| 3. | 11/14/2007 7:48:00 PM | NA |
| 4. | 11/14/2007 8:49:00 PM | See my ans to #15. We are not there yet. |
| 5. | 11/15/2007 4:41:00 PM | I would use it |
| 6. | 11/15/2007 11:45:00 PM | n/a |
| 7. | 11/16/2007 3:29:00 AM | incomplete, not upadated EMR |
| 8. | 11/16/2007 5:41:00 PM | This is an istitutional decision. |
| 9. | 11/19/2007 3:58:00 PM | concerned about time and data entrly constraints |
| 10. | 11/19/2007 10:14:00 PM | We currently have EMR |
| 11. | 11/19/2007 10:40:00 PM | No autonomy in decision making about EMR - Parent organization controls EMR choice |
| 12. | 11/20/2007 1:06:00 AM | na |
| 13. | 11/20/2007 1:36:00 AM | I would use a secure system. |
| 14. | 11/22/2007 1:10:00 AM | I would prefer to have my own EMR with interface to others |
| 15. | 11/22/2007 4:30:00 PM | This would be a phenomenal asset to the medical profession and the country's healthcare system. |
| 16. | 11/22/2007 4:41:00 PM | NA |
| 17. | 11/22/2007 6:01:00 PM | already have an EMR |
| 18. | 11/22/2007 6:28:00 PM | A real EMR/EHR system to be complete not only has to document patient data, but has to have areas where physicians can put their incomplete thoughts, considerations, and plans. Those areas should not be available to patients without physician incorporation into the specific patient record. Access to all physician thoughts could be destructive, and would likely cause physicians not to write down those thoughts...and will negatively impact on patient care, because he/she would have to rely on memory...or keep an entirely separate "diary"... |
| 19. | 11/22/2007 6:50:00 PM | our EMR is accessible to physicians in our health system |
| 20. | 11/22/2007 6:53:00 PM | concerned about abiloity to integrate |
| 21. | 11/22/2007 7:15:00 PM | Depends on functionality of HealthVault |
| 22. | 11/22/2007 7:20:00 PM | would it hold up in court??? |
| 23. | 11/22/2007 8:01:00 PM | My EMR records are many years old and very detailed, their is no need for duplication and my patients already have access |
| 24. | 11/22/2007 8:17:00 PM | Same answer as in #14 |
| 25. | 11/22/2007 8:40:00 PM | Security is not my concern. It's workflow functionality, integration of InPatient and Ambulatory records/workflows. My current belief is that mecivcal communities need to aggregate around enterprise systems that are patient/community focused. Addressing medicine as a collection of free-standing small proviiders fails to rercognize the potential for providing best-practice knowledge and quality review at the point of care. It's about community building. |
| 26. | 11/22/2007 9:19:00 PM | Patients will feel inhibited from telling me things of a sensitive nature |
| 27. | 11/22/2007 9:36:00 PM | I have my own EMR program at this point and am happy with it. |
| 28. | 11/22/2007 9:45:00 PM | bite me |
| 29. | 11/22/2007 11:36:00 PM | I want free, Microsoft EMR |
| 30. | 11/23/2007 12:01:00 AM | NA |
| 31. | 11/23/2007 12:49:00 AM | In the future the legal issues could come to dominate the concerns unless there is wide spread torte reform. |
| 32. | 11/23/2007 1:04:00 AM | I think paper charts are just as good as most of the record is superflous anyway |
| 33. | 11/23/2007 1:16:00 AM | Learning curve is usually steep for staff and physicians |
| 34. | 11/23/2007 1:20:00 AM | 1,2 ,3 4 |
| 35. | 11/23/2007 1:48:00 AM | hospital requires me to use the their EMR |
| 36. | 11/23/2007 2:16:00 AM | No EMR currently and too time consuming to upload the files |
| 37. | 11/23/2007 2:33:00 AM | I am in a large group and have no control over the EMR |
| 38. | 11/23/2007 3:29:00 AM | prefer to select my own EMR. |
| 39. | 11/23/2007 5:17:00 AM | N/A |
| 40. | 11/23/2007 6:31:00 AM | Our EMR does a lot of processing including growth chart plotting, prescription writing etc |
| 41. | 11/23/2007 8:22:00 AM | concerneded about a one size fits all approach. |
| 42. | 11/23/2007 1:04:00 PM | NA |
| 43. | 11/23/2007 1:16:00 PM | Have a good EMR system |
| 44. | 11/23/2007 1:32:00 PM | NA |
| 45. | 11/23/2007 2:04:00 PM | na |
| 46. | 11/23/2007 2:11:00 PM | see above |
| 47. | 11/23/2007 2:15:00 PM | I do not at all trust Microsoft to do this correctly and to keep it secure. I would not deal with them at all. |
| 48. | 11/23/2007 2:20:00 PM | I would like a system compatible with other comments above with which I can share most but perhaps not all of the patient's history |
| 49. | 11/23/2007 2:24:00 PM | Need to identify if Healthvault accomodates parameters that are specific to my subspecialty. |
| 50. | 11/23/2007 2:27:00 PM | All above are concerns but the benefits outweigh these |
| 51. | 11/23/2007 3:31:00 PM | I DO NOT TRUST THE QUALITY OF MICROSOFT PRODUCTS |
| 52. | 11/23/2007 3:43:00 PM | HealthVault would not be in competition with our in house EMR system. |
| 53. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | The queston of to whom the access password is given is difficult when you consider primary recipients. It becomes enormously more complex when you consider secondary and tertiary recipients |
| 54. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | I am primarily concerned about confidentiality. No EMR system can guarantee such. |
| 55. | 11/23/2007 6:59:00 PM | Note that I did not say that I would NOT use a broadened HealthVault instead of current EMR, BUT the above checked issues are all valid concerns |
| 56. | 11/23/2007 7:06:00 PM | I need more information about srecific system |
| 57. | 11/23/2007 7:30:00 PM | There hasn't been a free and practical EMR system available yet. One needs to look and like it. Reputation alone is no enough sway me. |
| 58. | 11/23/2007 8:41:00 PM | the above would be my concerns, but I would still consider using such a system |
| 59. | 11/23/2007 9:19:00 PM | NOT APPLICABLE |
| 60. | 11/23/2007 10:05:00 PM | Have my own EMR I am perfectly happy with. |
| 61. | 11/23/2007 10:59:00 PM | Again, I am in a University. The practice plan business administrators make those decisions. |
| 62. | 11/24/2007 12:15:00 AM | Hospital issues |
| 63. | 11/24/2007 12:39:00 AM | I would use it; but am still concerned about all of those issues. |
| 64. | 11/24/2007 4:27:00 AM | I work for a healthcare system with 800 attendings and 1100 trainees. I don't get to make this decision. |
| 65. | 11/24/2007 5:58:00 AM | see response 14. |
| 66. | 11/24/2007 12:36:00 PM | links to the financial software exist |
| 67. | 11/24/2007 2:49:00 PM | na |
| 68. | 11/24/2007 3:35:00 PM | First kill all the lawyers - Shakespeare |
| 69. | 11/24/2007 7:12:00 PM | N /A |
| 70. | 11/24/2007 11:48:00 PM | time management |
| 71. | 11/25/2007 1:37:00 AM | If I am always thinking about how anyone else (non-medical) could have access to such information without my ability to explain or frame in the context of what might be searched for, I would not be able to efficiently complete records as I would be constantly thinking of how it might be searched or used. |
| 72. | 11/25/2007 1:55:00 AM | Insurance companies would demand access prior to issuing coverage, and would use data to discriminate |
| 73. | 11/25/2007 3:02:00 PM | not applicable. |
| 74. | 11/25/2007 6:36:00 PM | i have signed up with one |
| 75. | 11/25/2007 6:54:00 PM | ? |
| 76. | 11/26/2007 1:14:00 AM | I have an EMR already in place |
| 77. | 11/26/2007 1:59:00 AM | no time |
| 78. | 11/26/2007 3:03:00 AM | TOO EXPENSIVE in my time and my employee's time. obtaining old records is rarely necessary, except for emergency room/ICU |
| 79. | 11/26/2007 12:25:00 PM | We have EMR. |
| 80. | 11/26/2007 3:58:00 PM | I would possibly use a free online system |
| 81. | 11/27/2007 2:40:00 AM | It depends on how complicated the system is to learn and to run. |
| 82. | 11/27/2007 9:59:00 PM | I jhave a system cuurently |
| 83. | 11/28/2007 12:41:00 AM | time and benefit to cost ratio to input |
| 84. | 11/28/2007 2:55:00 PM | Would depend on ease of use. |
| 85. | 11/28/2007 9:02:00 PM | see answer to #15 |
| 86. | 11/30/2007 12:13:00 AM | Insurance companies could take advantage of this system to deny or overcharge |
| 87. | 11/30/2007 1:51:00 PM | see above |