| 1. | 11/12/2007 7:52:00 PM | Don't know |
| 2. | 11/12/2007 8:57:00 PM | don't know1 |
| 3. | 11/14/2007 1:41:00 PM | our health system has it own database |
| 4. | 11/14/2007 5:30:00 PM | Wouls need a way to finance the transfer of file information |
| 5. | 11/14/2007 7:48:00 PM | NA |
| 6. | 11/14/2007 8:49:00 PM | Possibly if I did not,but i do. The important unsolved problem is interoperability between and among the countless systems out there. And there needs to be a continuous non-intrusive upgrading as new technology or ways of using it come along. |
| 7. | 11/15/2007 1:37:00 AM | see 6, see 14, see 9 |
| 8. | 11/15/2007 1:19:00 PM | N/A |
| 9. | 11/15/2007 4:29:00 PM | n/a |
| 10. | 11/15/2007 6:13:00 PM | N/A |
| 11. | 11/15/2007 11:45:00 PM | we have an emr |
| 12. | 11/16/2007 4:18:00 AM | possibly |
| 13. | 11/19/2007 1:37:00 PM | not sure |
| 14. | 11/19/2007 2:00:00 PM | Our material is governed by more complex statutes than regular medical records. |
| 15. | 11/19/2007 3:58:00 PM | if would have to be a group decision for practice and based on economics |
| 16. | 11/19/2007 7:01:00 PM | possibley |
| 17. | 11/20/2007 8:39:00 PM | Same as above. Would certainly do it with the green light from our institution, including review by our legal office |
| 18. | 11/22/2007 4:55:00 PM | possibly |
| 19. | 11/22/2007 5:04:00 PM | Possibly, with more info on who has access to what |
| 20. | 11/22/2007 5:23:00 PM | not sure |
| 21. | 11/22/2007 5:39:00 PM | depends on the ease of using the system |
| 22. | 11/22/2007 5:44:00 PM | not in practice |
| 23. | 11/22/2007 5:48:00 PM | Again, there are a lot of "it depends." |
| 24. | 11/22/2007 5:54:00 PM | maybe |
| 25. | 11/22/2007 6:01:00 PM | If secure |
| 26. | 11/22/2007 6:05:00 PM | depends on dificulty and time needed to install and learn the system |
| 27. | 11/22/2007 6:14:00 PM | I don't know |
| 28. | 11/22/2007 6:28:00 PM | I have one, so I cannot comment on this. |
| 29. | 11/22/2007 6:37:00 PM | I would support this within our system |
| 30. | 11/22/2007 6:50:00 PM | have an EMR |
| 31. | 11/22/2007 6:59:00 PM | I do have a EMR. However, if I didn't, I would use it. As I work for an academic edical center, I will not have the option of doing so but would support doing so. |
| 32. | 11/22/2007 7:15:00 PM | NA |
| 33. | 11/22/2007 7:23:00 PM | don't know |
| 34. | 11/22/2007 7:30:00 PM | have an EMR |
| 35. | 11/22/2007 8:16:00 PM | would need to trial and see how user friendly |
| 36. | 11/22/2007 8:40:00 PM | In order to appeal, maximum benefit will accrue when Clinical Record is integrated with Ordering/Resulting, Scheduling, Practice Management. Achieve administrative needs in the course of care, not as a separate event. Take work orff my plate. |
| 37. | 11/22/2007 8:56:00 PM | \do not know enough about the system |
| 38. | 11/22/2007 9:36:00 PM | n/a |
| 39. | 11/22/2007 10:08:00 PM | I work for a large organization. It would be their decision |
| 40. | 11/23/2007 12:01:00 AM | NA |
| 41. | 11/23/2007 12:29:00 AM | I would have to evaluate the software and any attached licenses. |
| 42. | 11/23/2007 12:41:00 AM | it would depend on the functionality of the free EMR |
| 43. | 11/23/2007 12:49:00 AM | See 14 |
| 44. | 11/23/2007 1:16:00 AM | Probably yes, if the EMR is pediatrician-friendly (I am a pediatrician) |
| 45. | 11/23/2007 1:20:00 AM | possibly, need more information |
| 46. | 11/23/2007 1:48:00 AM | I have an EMR system already |
| 47. | 11/23/2007 2:09:00 AM | Don't know |
| 48. | 11/23/2007 2:15:00 AM | n/a |
| 49. | 11/23/2007 3:40:00 AM | I'm a hospital employee. The MBA's who run my life & know more about health care than me would never tolerate the loss of control. |
| 50. | 11/23/2007 3:41:00 AM | not applicable - I have an EMR |
| 51. | 11/23/2007 3:42:00 AM | maybe, see answer to 14 |
| 52. | 11/23/2007 4:01:00 AM | Not applicable |
| 53. | 11/23/2007 4:18:00 AM | perhaps |
| 54. | 11/23/2007 5:17:00 AM | N/A |
| 55. | 11/23/2007 6:32:00 AM | n/a |
| 56. | 11/23/2007 7:34:00 AM | n/a |
| 57. | 11/23/2007 8:22:00 AM | I have an EMR. However, that means as an "expert" user, I will be aware if MS can create a "better tool" for EMR. |
| 58. | 11/23/2007 12:33:00 PM | may be |
| 59. | 11/23/2007 1:04:00 PM | NA |
| 60. | 11/23/2007 1:16:00 PM | NA |
| 61. | 11/23/2007 1:30:00 PM | n/a |
| 62. | 11/23/2007 2:05:00 PM | Would not get rid of my system now, ubt could consider if it is free and what it involves |
| 63. | 11/23/2007 2:11:00 PM | Imagine maybe yes |
| 64. | 11/23/2007 2:20:00 PM | see question 14 comment |
| 65. | 11/23/2007 2:24:00 PM | Depending on how this is designed. |
| 66. | 11/23/2007 2:30:00 PM | I still have major concerns about internet security, particularly in respect to insurance industry abuse. |
| 67. | 11/23/2007 3:12:00 PM | maybe |
| 68. | 11/23/2007 3:35:00 PM | Would have to evaluate system more. |
| 69. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | I would consider it. It is premature for you to ask for a Yes/No answer to this question. |
| 70. | 11/23/2007 4:18:00 PM | does not apply |
| 71. | 11/23/2007 4:56:00 PM | depends on ease of use and applicability to my practice |
| 72. | 11/23/2007 5:01:00 PM | Not sure, would need to evaluate functionality of system vs. requirements and security |
| 73. | 11/23/2007 6:00:00 PM | Yes |
| 74. | 11/23/2007 7:24:00 PM | I would consider it |
| 75. | 11/23/2007 7:30:00 PM | It would depend on how easy/awkward the whole system may be. I don't buy pig in the poke. |
| 76. | 11/23/2007 7:48:00 PM | we have our own emr system |
| 77. | 11/23/2007 8:02:00 PM | Currently in the process of getting up on an EMR system. Not there yet |
| 78. | 11/23/2007 8:56:00 PM | I don't know |
| 79. | 11/23/2007 9:19:00 PM | NOT APPLICABLE |
| 80. | 11/23/2007 10:05:00 PM | N/A |
| 81. | 11/24/2007 12:24:00 AM | not sure |
| 82. | 11/24/2007 12:39:00 AM | Provided I was allowed to,....see above answer. |
| 83. | 11/24/2007 2:07:00 AM | NA |
| 84. | 11/24/2007 2:18:00 AM | maybe |
| 85. | 11/24/2007 4:27:00 AM | In my off-campus clinic (currently on paper with dictated notes going to the EMR) a stellar EMR that made it easier to enter visit data would be helpful, but would likely run afoul of the university's privacy regulations. |
| 86. | 11/24/2007 5:37:00 AM | I have an EMR |
| 87. | 11/24/2007 5:58:00 AM | n/a |
| 88. | 11/24/2007 6:58:00 AM | I HAVE AN EMR |
| 89. | 11/24/2007 12:48:00 PM | If the EMR was user friendly and I was assured there were no hidden charges |
| 90. | 11/24/2007 3:20:00 PM | need to ;earn more about this before commenting either way |
| 91. | 11/24/2007 3:29:00 PM | depends |
| 92. | 11/24/2007 10:34:00 PM | I use an EMR system. |
| 93. | 11/24/2007 11:48:00 PM | If I have the time to do so |
| 94. | 11/25/2007 1:37:00 AM | Not sure |
| 95. | 11/25/2007 1:38:00 AM | Would consider it |
| 96. | 11/25/2007 1:55:00 AM | N/A |
| 97. | 11/25/2007 3:57:00 AM | Possibly |
| 98. | 11/25/2007 2:40:00 PM | EMR already fully implemented, not a fan of online or asp models |
| 99. | 11/25/2007 4:33:00 PM | maybe |
| 100. | 11/25/2007 5:59:00 PM | already have EMR |
| 101. | 11/25/2007 6:54:00 PM | If it fits our needs |
| 102. | 11/26/2007 1:08:00 AM | need more info on this system |
| 103. | 11/26/2007 1:14:00 AM | N/A |
| 104. | 11/26/2007 2:04:00 AM | Maybe, it depends on being able to get the data if Microsoft stops support |
| 105. | 11/26/2007 3:03:00 AM | (1) only if i get PAID VERY WELL , since the record will need careful editing (2) only if i'm held NOT LIABLE for any breach of security |
| 106. | 11/26/2007 3:35:00 AM | would worry about securiy |
| 107. | 11/26/2007 4:17:00 AM | not relevant as using my hospitals EMR now |
| 108. | 11/26/2007 5:04:00 AM | NA |
| 109. | 11/26/2007 11:04:00 AM | not applicable |
| 110. | 11/26/2007 12:25:00 PM | My Health care system has EMR. |
| 111. | 11/26/2007 1:03:00 PM | have an internet based ob/gyn specific EMR digiChart OB/Gyn |
| 112. | 11/26/2007 2:28:00 PM | Belong to a teaching hospital |
| 113. | 11/26/2007 2:47:00 PM | Maybe. |
| 114. | 11/26/2007 3:09:00 PM | N/A |
| 115. | 11/26/2007 3:58:00 PM | Possibly, it would depend on comparing this system with others available |
| 116. | 11/26/2007 5:16:00 PM | if secure |
| 117. | 11/26/2007 9:42:00 PM | I would consider that. |
| 118. | 11/26/2007 11:55:00 PM | NA |
| 119. | 11/27/2007 1:16:00 AM | maybe |
| 120. | 11/27/2007 1:42:00 AM | maybe |
| 121. | 11/27/2007 2:13:00 AM | I would have to learn more about it to make that kind of decision. |
| 122. | 11/27/2007 2:40:00 AM | It depends on how complicated the system is to learn and to run. |
| 123. | 11/27/2007 3:55:00 AM | There is no way all of a physicians' patients would want their information on the web |
| 124. | 11/27/2007 8:20:00 PM | N/A |
| 125. | 11/28/2007 2:55:00 PM | We are implementing one now so this doesn't apply. |
| 126. | 11/28/2007 9:02:00 PM | There would still have to be a way for providers to protect certain assessments, comments that they feel are not appropriate for the patient to see unless physician was notified in advance/?permission?, ie mental health issue. |
| 127. | 11/29/2007 5:38:00 PM | would need more information before considering |
| 128. | 11/29/2007 9:17:00 PM | See above |
| 129. | 11/29/2007 11:05:00 PM | maybe |
| 130. | 11/30/2007 1:51:00 PM | Depends on the TIME it takes to use the EMR. The most valuable commodity in the office is my TIME - if the EMR takes longer to chart than paper with check off boxes or a scribe, then it is too expensive even if it is free. |
| 131. | 12/2/2007 8:44:00 AM | N/A |
| 132. | 12/2/2007 11:54:00 AM | have emr |