1. | 11/13/2007 3:07:00 AM | maybe,but confidentiality cannot be guaranteed |
2. | 11/14/2007 1:41:00 PM | In my country it´s not allowed to fax medical records with patient name or ID on it |
3. | 11/14/2007 5:19:00 PM | There are some issues and diagnoses that cannot be interpreted by a lay person |
4. | 11/14/2007 8:49:00 PM | I take it these would be scanned reports. The filing under usefulheadings and subheadings is important and even so time consuming for the medical provider to extract the relevant info for the current issue(s). |
5. | 11/15/2007 1:37:00 AM | Is security issues were not the main concern, then yes. |
6. | 11/15/2007 4:29:00 PM | Again, privacy concerns are an issue. |
7. | 11/15/2007 6:13:00 PM | I'm concerned that the reocrd may be incomplete and therefore interpreted incorrectly |
8. | 11/16/2007 4:18:00 AM | no experience |
9. | 11/19/2007 2:00:00 PM | Not sure where the benefit in this ability is. |
10. | 11/19/2007 2:36:00 PM | could be |
11. | 11/19/2007 7:01:00 PM | may be difficult and time consuming for physician to do that without any compensation |
12. | 11/20/2007 5:36:00 AM | Probably yes but needs further discussion in Canada |
13. | 11/20/2007 3:14:00 PM | Not necessarily |
14. | 11/22/2007 5:39:00 PM | depends on the accessibility of the site to the physician |
15. | 11/22/2007 5:40:00 PM | unknown |
16. | 11/22/2007 5:48:00 PM | It really depends on the security. Yes, if it is as secure as records in the physician's office. |
17. | 11/22/2007 6:14:00 PM | as long as it is accurate and up to date |
18. | 11/22/2007 6:28:00 PM | Depends on the quality of the information on the paper records, and what information is available... |
19. | 11/22/2007 7:30:00 PM | possibly |
20. | 11/22/2007 8:40:00 PM | As above. We already have that capability within the Enterprise., |
21. | 11/22/2007 9:19:00 PM | Assuming the physician gives their approval |
22. | 11/22/2007 11:37:00 PM | Depends on how much garbage is stored there |
23. | 11/23/2007 12:29:00 AM | Yes, as long as the record is complete. If incomplete, data/information may be liable to be misinterpreted. |
24. | 11/23/2007 12:48:00 AM | could be |
25. | 11/23/2007 12:49:00 AM | The whole crux of the matter is the term secure |
26. | 11/23/2007 1:15:00 AM | uncertain where this fits in. |
27. | 11/23/2007 1:20:00 AM | no , I would need more information |
28. | 11/23/2007 7:34:00 AM | most of us at major centers already have EMRs, not paper records |
29. | 11/23/2007 2:30:00 PM | only if security can be maintained. Security is still a major iternet problem (just ask the Pentagon!) |
30. | 11/23/2007 3:31:00 PM | don't know |
31. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | The problem is one of confidentiality of information, for which I have primary responsibility. |
32. | 11/23/2007 5:01:00 PM | Possibly, but need more information on security and how information could be used |
33. | 11/23/2007 6:00:00 PM | yes |
34. | 11/23/2007 6:59:00 PM | potentially, briefly, while many physicians are still in paper; for those of us in EMR, faxing paper would not be preferred manner of communication/sharing/storage |
35. | 11/23/2007 7:48:00 PM | dont know |
36. | 11/23/2007 8:02:00 PM | HIPAA questions as to how this paper record gets from the MD office through a secure fax line without the doctor incurring significant costs |
37. | 11/23/2007 9:05:00 PM | Patient must be prevented from altering these records |
38. | 11/23/2007 9:59:00 PM | May be, may be not |
39. | 11/23/2007 10:59:00 PM | depends on degree of medical terrminology, level of pt understanding, where in the "grief" process they might be in a chronic issue. |
40. | 11/24/2007 12:49:00 AM | possiblity of fax being sent to wrong number too great |
41. | 11/24/2007 12:48:00 PM | who will pay the doctor to fax the results? |
42. | 11/25/2007 1:37:00 AM | Anything fax'd can be "written over"-- can be helpful but the patient alone is accountable for the integrity of such "forwarded on" information |
43. | 11/25/2007 2:40:00 PM | really need digital databasable information |
44. | 11/26/2007 1:59:00 AM | depending ofn what quality of records are faxed |
45. | 11/26/2007 3:09:00 PM | Pts reviewing and controlling their own records could lead to more questions and concerns which may be unnecessary |
46. | 11/26/2007 11:55:00 PM | Could be beneficial if info is well protected. |
47. | 11/27/2007 2:40:00 AM | But summaries would be better. |
48. | 11/27/2007 10:17:00 PM | Potentially yes but for selected documents and selected patients. |
49. | 11/28/2007 12:41:00 AM | unknown |
50. | 11/29/2007 11:05:00 PM | Coul be |
51. | 12/2/2007 8:44:00 AM | most patients would have difficulty understanding everything within their record and mis-interpretation could pose problems |