1. | 11/12/2007 7:52:00 PM | Don't know |
2. | 11/12/2007 8:57:00 PM | possibly |
3. | 11/14/2007 1:41:00 PM | don´t know enough about it |
4. | 11/14/2007 8:49:00 PM | I would ask the pt for permission to access what is there and be interested in uploading only specific pertinent info for the problems the patien and I are currently dealing with. Already we are drowning in information . It is hard to anticipate just what permutations and combinations of medical and personal information about a patient are going to be needed or useful in any one instance. |
5. | 11/15/2007 1:37:00 AM | need to know security issue and who would be legally responsible for "leaked info" |
6. | 11/15/2007 4:29:00 PM | Not unless it is certified HIPAA compliant |
7. | 11/15/2007 6:13:00 PM | Not until all security issues had been exhaustively studied |
8. | 11/15/2007 11:45:00 PM | possibly--would need permission |
9. | 11/16/2007 4:18:00 AM | no experience |
10. | 11/17/2007 2:46:00 AM | that would be up to the company I work for. |
11. | 11/19/2007 2:00:00 PM | I would have to if that was the only source of record material available. |
12. | 11/19/2007 2:36:00 PM | not until I know more |
13. | 11/19/2007 7:01:00 PM | possibly |
14. | 11/19/2007 8:11:00 PM | Maybe. |
15. | 11/20/2007 1:36:00 AM | If I knew more, yes. |
16. | 11/22/2007 5:04:00 PM | depends on who exactly can access the patient health information and mine the data |
17. | 11/22/2007 5:39:00 PM | do not know the reliability of the info |
18. | 11/22/2007 5:48:00 PM | Of course it will cost, staff time if nothing else. But I might do it anyway. |
19. | 11/22/2007 6:01:00 PM | maybe |
20. | 11/22/2007 6:01:00 PM | maybe--depending on assurance of privacy and security |
21. | 11/22/2007 6:14:00 PM | I am not sure |
22. | 11/22/2007 6:28:00 PM | We would have to sit down and review the specifics long before I would say yes, or no... |
23. | 11/22/2007 6:59:00 PM | Yes, recognizing that time is a cost and must be accounted for. |
24. | 11/22/2007 7:06:00 PM | maybe |
25. | 11/22/2007 7:20:00 PM | maybe, it would depend on liability issues, HIPPA issues, and costs |
26. | 11/22/2007 8:12:00 PM | I do know |
27. | 11/22/2007 8:16:00 PM | would depend on the amount of time required to do so |
28. | 11/22/2007 8:40:00 PM | With the patients direct authorizaton, obviously yes. The information is the patient's, not mine. I've got an intellectual property rights interest in my work product and the record of that work, but the information is the patient's. |
29. | 11/22/2007 8:56:00 PM | do not know enough about the system |
30. | 11/22/2007 9:19:00 PM | I would need assurances that no one could alter this record. |
31. | 11/22/2007 9:36:00 PM | maybe; would depend on security issues |
32. | 11/23/2007 12:29:00 AM | Possibly--if the patient requested I do so. |
33. | 11/23/2007 12:48:00 AM | not enough info on security issues |
34. | 11/23/2007 12:49:00 AM | No I vould leave that decision and action up to the patient |
35. | 11/23/2007 1:15:00 AM | What would be the benefit. It seems to be an unnecessary step |
36. | 11/23/2007 1:20:00 AM | possibly, I need more information |
37. | 11/23/2007 2:09:00 AM | Don't know |
38. | 11/23/2007 2:15:00 AM | it would depend on the situation. Psychiatric records could be easily misinterpreted |
39. | 11/23/2007 3:29:00 AM | Depends upon the ease of doing so. I would not do it if it took a significant amount of my staff's time. |
40. | 11/23/2007 6:31:00 AM | depends on security |
41. | 11/23/2007 12:57:00 PM | I would want the cohic what to upload or not |
42. | 11/23/2007 1:22:00 PM | I'm woried about legal issues |
43. | 11/23/2007 1:30:00 PM | maybe |
44. | 11/23/2007 2:05:00 PM | Might if we would be relaesed from legal repurcussions for uploading it even with patitnes permission |
45. | 11/23/2007 2:11:00 PM | Maybe. Depends partly on subtle obstacles (like time it took my staff, calls needed to a help desk, questions from pts, etc.) You'll need a lot of focus group and beta feedback to identify these deal-breaking hurdles. |
46. | 11/23/2007 2:20:00 PM | It would cost time which is money; so it would have to be quick |
47. | 11/23/2007 2:24:00 PM | Maybe...but need to know more about the Health Vault. |
48. | 11/23/2007 3:12:00 PM | don't know at this time |
49. | 11/23/2007 3:31:00 PM | ONLY IF THE PATIENT INSISTED ON DOING IT |
50. | 11/23/2007 3:35:00 PM | Selected records. Some that include particularly sensitive data would be excluded. |
51. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | Not on initial patient request, but only after discussion about my concerns relative to secondary password dissemination |
52. | 11/23/2007 3:57:00 PM | I am concerned about confidentiality, and there is not guarantee of such, nor is such a guarantee possible. |
53. | 11/23/2007 4:38:00 PM | Would I be responsible if some one hacked into the data? Who would reimmburse me for my time to do this? |
54. | 11/23/2007 5:01:00 PM | Possibly, but need more information on security and how information could be used |
55. | 11/23/2007 6:00:00 PM | yes |
56. | 11/23/2007 6:59:00 PM | potentially; would want to work out with office protocols and with patients whether and how documents would be shared/transferred |
57. | 11/23/2007 7:24:00 PM | Pertinent information |
58. | 11/23/2007 7:30:00 PM | With the caveat that if he/she deleted parts of it - it would mark the area involved. |
59. | 11/23/2007 8:02:00 PM | Insufficient information provided in the question to answer. Could be yes or no based upon the security and resources required |
60. | 11/23/2007 9:05:00 PM | not unless my records were secure from alteration |
61. | 11/23/2007 10:59:00 PM | yes, of course with patient request, as their health record belongs to them or to guardian. In our "system," they would have to request each timefrom medical records, not me however. |
62. | 11/24/2007 12:24:00 AM | not sure |
63. | 11/24/2007 2:07:00 AM | maybe |
64. | 11/24/2007 4:27:00 AM | It couldn't cost me nothing to upload the data, unless my time or the work product of my university's IT staff is worth nothing. |
65. | 11/24/2007 5:37:00 AM | Too hypothetical. The devil with such a plan is in the details. |
66. | 11/24/2007 12:36:00 PM | only if forced to do so |
67. | 11/24/2007 12:48:00 PM | Assuming it was HIPA compliant |
68. | 11/24/2007 3:03:00 PM | Only if pt has signed medical info release on record. One - time only...would not update on regular basis |
69. | 11/24/2007 3:35:00 PM | Maybe - the security issues, patient confidentiality and liability laws would have to change signficantly before this would be a viable option. |
70. | 11/24/2007 7:12:00 PM | Probably |
71. | 11/24/2007 11:48:00 PM | not sure |
72. | 11/25/2007 1:37:00 AM | Possibly--not sure yet. |
73. | 11/25/2007 3:57:00 AM | Possibly |
74. | 11/25/2007 1:35:00 PM | Patiwnt would have to understand the risks and relieve me of any liability if the info gets out |
75. | 11/25/2007 3:02:00 PM | not sure |
76. | 11/25/2007 4:33:00 PM | need assurances re security and confidentiality acceptable to regulators |
77. | 11/25/2007 7:08:00 PM | it depends on legal circustanses, most likely yes |
78. | 11/26/2007 1:08:00 AM | no emr |
79. | 11/26/2007 2:24:00 PM | on request of patient assuming minimal transfer time |
80. | 11/26/2007 2:28:00 PM | Unsure, not enough info |
81. | 11/26/2007 5:16:00 PM | Possible, but I would have to feel comfortable with the EMR system and its interfacing. |
82. | 11/26/2007 6:05:00 PM | This would be very cumbersome due to HIPPA |
83. | 11/27/2007 1:16:00 AM | possibly |
84. | 11/27/2007 3:55:00 AM | Not sure now |
85. | 11/27/2007 4:16:00 AM | Don't know. |
86. | 11/27/2007 1:06:00 PM | possibly |
87. | 11/28/2007 12:22:00 PM | I am part of a larger network of docs EMR so it would be a decision that would need to be made by the larger group |
88. | 11/29/2007 9:17:00 PM | Too little information; it always costs money, even if just to review the chart. |
89. | 11/29/2007 11:05:00 PM | but we don't have EMR |